HomeGlossarySecurity of Supply
Defence & Security Procurement

Security of Supply

Security of supply in defence procurement refers to the assurance that a contracting authority needs that a supplier can deliver and sustain the contracted goods or services reliably, including under demanding operational conditions, crises, or geopolitical disruptions, without compromising national or allied security.

Quick answer

Security of supply in defence procurement refers to the assurance that a contracting authority needs that a supplier can deliver and sustain the contracted goods or services reliably, including under demanding operational conditions, crises, or geopolitical disruptions, without compromising national or allied security.


Security of supply is one of the distinguishing features of defence and security procurement that has no equivalent in standard public procurement. Contracting authorities procuring military equipment, critical infrastructure protection systems, or sensitive services must be confident not only that a supplier can deliver under normal commercial conditions, but that delivery will be maintained when it is most needed: during crises, conflicts, or supply chain disruptions.

What is security of supply?

Security of supply encompasses several related concerns. Continuity of delivery means that the supplier can fulfil its contractual obligations across the full contract term, including under adverse conditions. Supply chain resilience means that the supplier's own supply chain, including sub-suppliers and component manufacturers, does not have points of failure that could interrupt delivery of critical equipment or services. Operational availability means that delivered systems will be maintained, upgraded, and sustained to the required operational standard throughout their service life.

Under Directive 2009/81/EC, contracting authorities are explicitly permitted to impose security of supply requirements as selection or contract performance conditions. These may include requirements for the supplier to maintain strategic stocks of spare parts, to prioritise government orders in the event of scarcity, to agree to government oversight of subcontractor chains, to ensure that production capacity can be surged in an emergency, and to obtain their government's commitment that export licences will be granted for ongoing supply of the contracted system.

The export licence dimension is particularly significant. A weapon system or sensitive equipment component may require an export licence from the manufacturer's home country before it can be supplied to a foreign government. Where the supplier is a foreign company, the contracting authority must assess the risk that the manufacturer's government could, for political reasons, decline to issue the necessary export licence at a critical moment, interrupting support for an in-service system. This risk is one driver of preferences for domestic suppliers or for government-to-government arrangements that build supply assurance into the inter-state relationship.

The European Defence Agency (EDA) has worked to develop frameworks that support supply assurance across European markets, including model clauses that member states can include in contracts to standardise security of supply expectations.

Why it matters for bidders

For suppliers competing in European defence markets, demonstrating credible security of supply is increasingly a differentiator. Contracting authorities are acutely aware of supply chain vulnerabilities following recent global disruptions, and suppliers who can show robust supply chain management, strategic stock arrangements, and cooperative export licence arrangements with their home government will score more favourably in evaluations.

Suppliers who source critical components from countries whose export reliability is questionable, or who cannot demonstrate operational surge capacity, may face disadvantage even if their primary technical solution is superior. Building supply assurance into bid proposals, including evidence of supply chain resilience, stockpile arrangements, and government-to-government supply commitments where relevant, is essential in competitive tenders under 2009/81/EC.

Example

A Czech Republic ministry of defence procures an air defence radar system from a French manufacturer. The contract specification includes security of supply conditions requiring the manufacturer to maintain a ten-year stock of critical replacement modules in a bonded warehouse in the Czech Republic, to provide priority delivery rights for Czech government orders during any period of global scarcity, and to confirm that the French government has agreed to grant export licences for spare parts on an expedited basis at any point during the system's operational life.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can security of supply requirements be used to discriminate in favour of domestic suppliers?

Security of supply requirements must be proportionate and applied equally to all tenderers. They cannot be drafted in a way that only a domestic supplier could realistically satisfy. However, objective supply assurance conditions, such as requirements for local spare part stockholding or export licence commitments, that a domestic supplier happens to satisfy more easily than a foreign one are generally permissible under 2009/81/EC.

How does security of supply interact with the offset and industrial participation framework?

Governments often structure industrial participation programmes partly to address security of supply concerns. By requiring domestic production of key components as part of an offset obligation, a government creates a domestic supply source that is not subject to foreign export controls. The two concepts are legally distinct but strategically interconnected.

Is security of supply relevant for services contracts as well as equipment contracts?

Yes. For critical IT and communications services, cybersecurity, logistics, and maintenance contracts in the defence and security sector, the contracting authority needs the same assurance that the service can be maintained reliably and securely. Data sovereignty (ensuring that sensitive data does not pass through systems controlled by potentially adversarial states) is an increasingly prominent security of supply issue in services procurement.

How Bidovate helps

Bidovate puts Security of Supply to work inside your capture and proposal workflow.

Tender discovery

See Bidovate in action

Book a demo and we will show you the platform using your actual contract data.

Related terms

Defence Procurement Directive (2009/81/EC)

Directive 2009/81/EC is the EU's specialised procurement law governing the award of contracts for military equipment, sensitive security equipment, and related works and services, balancing open competition with the confidentiality and security requirements unique to defence markets.

View

Classified Contract

A classified contract is a public contract where the subject matter, performance, or documentation requires protection under national or international security classification rules, obliging both the contracting authority and the contractor to handle all associated information according to the relevant security regulations.

View

Sensitive Equipment

Sensitive equipment in the procurement context refers to goods, systems, or technologies that require special security handling, controlled access, or restricted trade because of their actual or potential application in defence, intelligence, critical infrastructure protection, or other security-relevant uses.

View

Article 346 TFEU (Essential Security Interests)

Article 346 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union allows EU member states to exclude specific contracts from the application of EU public procurement rules where disclosure of the information involved would be contrary to the essential security interests of the state.

View

Government-to-Government Procurement (Defence)

Government-to-government (G2G) defence procurement is an arrangement in which one national government acquires military equipment, systems, or services directly from another national government, bypassing commercial competition and relying on the inter-state relationship to govern supply terms, pricing, and assurance.

View