Quick answer
Accessibility requirements in procurement are technical specifications and contract conditions that ensure goods, services, and works procured with public funds are usable by people with disabilities and those with age-related or temporary functional limitations, mandated by Directive 2014/24/EU and the European Accessibility Act (Directive 2019/882/EU) for applicable product and service categories.
Accessibility requirements in procurement translate disability rights law into practical obligations on what governments buy. When a public authority purchases a digital service, a piece of office furniture, a transport system, or a public building, accessibility requirements ensure that the outcome can be used by everyone, including the approximately 100 million people with disabilities living in the EU. Getting these requirements right benefits not only users with permanent disabilities but also older adults, people with temporary injuries, and people in situationally limiting environments such as bright sunlight or noisy offices.
What are accessibility requirements in procurement?
Article 42(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU requires that, where a contract is intended for use by natural persons, the technical specifications shall take into account accessibility criteria for people with disabilities or design for all users, except in duly justified cases. This is a mandatory consideration for relevant contracts, not an optional add-on.
The European Accessibility Act, Directive 2019/882/EU, which member states were required to transpose by June 2022 with product and service obligations applying from June 2025, significantly expands the mandatory accessibility baseline for key product and service categories. These include computers and operating systems, ticketing machines, ATMs, e-readers, telecoms services, banking services, e-books and software, e-commerce, and passenger transport services. For contracting authorities procuring these categories, compliance with Directive 2019/882/EU is not only a procurement obligation but a legal requirement applicable to the supplied product or service itself.
Technical standards for accessibility in procurement are primarily drawn from the European standard EN 301 549, which covers the accessibility requirements for ICT products and services and incorporates WCAG 2.1 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) at level AA for digital content. The EU's Web Accessibility Directive 2016/2102 already requires public sector websites and mobile applications to meet EN 301 549 standards and publish accessibility statements.
In the UK, the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) Accessibility Regulations 2018 implement equivalent requirements. The Equality Act 2010 creates a duty to make reasonable adjustments to goods and services provided to the public, which procurement officers must factor into technical specifications.
Why it matters for bidders
For suppliers, accessibility requirements create clear specification obligations. A digital platform procured by a contracting authority must meet EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA as a minimum for ICT. Failure to comply can result in contract performance failures even if the core functionality is delivered. Conversely, suppliers who can demonstrate robust, tested accessibility as a standard feature of their product have a genuine competitive advantage in markets where this is an award criterion.
For innovation-friendly procurement contexts, accessibility is increasingly framed as a quality and innovation indicator rather than a compliance checkbox, rewarding suppliers who go beyond minimum standards.
Example
A Finnish city authority procures a public transport journey planning app under a three-year service contract. The technical specification requires full compliance with EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA, compatibility with leading screen reader software on both iOS and Android, and support for high-contrast display modes. The award criteria include 15 percent weighting for demonstrated accessibility, assessed through a live testing session with a panel of users with visual and cognitive disabilities during evaluation. Two bidders who meet the minimum standard but offer no additional accessibility features score identically on that criterion; a third bidder who has integrated audio description and simplified journey planning modes scores above the maximum threshold level and wins the accessibility component outright.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are accessibility requirements mandatory for all public contracts?
The mandatory consideration under Article 42 of Directive 2014/24/EU applies to contracts "intended for use by natural persons," which covers most goods and services procured for public use. Works contracts for public buildings, ICT services, transport, and health services are clearly covered. Pure back-office procurement where there is no direct interface with the public may be treated differently, but the default should be to consider accessibility for any user-facing output. The European Accessibility Act creates mandatory product-level standards for specified categories regardless of who the end user is.
What happens if accessible products cost more than non-accessible alternatives?
Accessibility cannot be traded off against price in a way that results in a non-accessible output: it is a specification requirement, not an award criterion (though it may feature in both). Where accessible products carry a genuine cost premium, contracting authorities should reflect this in budget planning. The long-term cost of procuring inaccessible systems, including the cost of remediation and the reputational and legal exposure, typically far exceeds the cost of specifying accessibility from the outset.
Can an SME compete effectively on accessibility?
Yes. Accessibility is a technical quality dimension, not a scale advantage. A specialist SME with deep expertise in assistive technology or accessible design may outperform large IT contractors on this criterion. The key is evidencing accessibility through testing, certification, and user research rather than through assurances alone.
How Bidovate helps
Bidovate puts Accessibility Requirements in Procurement to work inside your capture and proposal workflow.
Tender discoverySee Bidovate in action
Book a demo and we will show you the platform using your actual contract data.
Related terms
Social Criteria in Award
Social criteria in award are qualitative factors related to employment, working conditions, community benefit, or social integration that contracting authorities may include in the award stage of a public procurement, assessed as part of the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) evaluation under Article 67 of Directive 2014/24/EU, provided they are linked to the subject matter of the contract.
ViewSocial Value in Procurement
Social value in procurement refers to the additional economic, social, and environmental benefits that a contracting authority seeks to generate through its purchasing decisions, beyond the direct delivery of the contracted goods or services, encompassing employment, skills, community wellbeing, and environmental outcomes linked to the subject matter of the contract.
ViewInnovation-Friendly Procurement
Innovation-friendly procurement describes public purchasing approaches that actively seek novel solutions to public challenges rather than specifying existing products or methods, using instruments such as pre-commercial procurement, innovation partnerships, functional specifications, and outcome-based award criteria as provided under Directive 2014/24/EU and national innovation procurement strategies across Europe.
ViewSME-Friendly Procurement
SME-friendly procurement describes the design of public purchasing processes in ways that reduce the cost and complexity of participation for smaller businesses, including proportionate selection criteria, lot division, simplified documentation, and early market engagement, without compromising the transparency and equal treatment obligations of European procurement law.
ViewCommunity Benefit Clause
A community benefit clause is a contractual term inserted in a public contract that requires the contractor to deliver specified social, economic, or environmental outcomes for the local community during contract performance, such as creating employment opportunities, providing training, or engaging local supply chains, enforceable alongside the core commercial obligations.
View